top of page

Learn

Resources to learn more about the issues with edtech and 1:1 device programs.

Watch

A More Perfect Union: "Our Kid's IQs Are Dropping. Is BigTech to Blame?

SFCxUS - Untangling EdTech: Evidence, Vision, Practice

Panel discussion co-moderated by SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech Founder, Jodi Carreon, featuring neuroscientist and author Jared Cooney Horvath, Andrew Cantarutti a teacher focused on reclaiming the art of deep learning in the age of distraction, and Inge Esping a middle school principal who is rolling back the 1:1 device model in her school.

BOOK CLUB

The Digital Delusion Book Club

Book club discussion co-moderated by SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech Founder, Jodi Carreon, featuring neuroscientist and author of The Digital Delusion, Jared Cooney Horvath PhD MEd

Listen

Teachers and even entire U.S. school districts are cutting back the time students spend on laptops and other screens. How do students really learn -- and do screens help or hurt? This episode features administrators and educators discussion their decisions to roll back devices and the positive effects they are already seeing.

Ezra Klien discusses how A.I. is transforming what it means to work and be educated, and how our use of A.I. could revive — or undermine — American schools with Rebecca Winthrop, Director of the Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution.

Articles

An introduction into the issues surrounding the use of screens in schools:

​

The Free Press, Jared Cooney Horvath, We Gave Students Laptops and Took Away Their Brains

​​​

After Babel, Amy Tyson, The False Promise of Device Based Education​​​​​​​​​

​

​

Additional articles exploring the issue:

​

Bloomberg, Kids Spend Hours on A Screen And for What?

​

The Economist, Ed tech is profitable. It is also mostly useless: Independent research identifies few learning gains

​

NBC News, Parents are opting their students out of schools laptops, returning them to pen-and-paper

​

NBC News, Parents say school-issued iPads are causing chaos with their kids

​

NBC News, Google’s Work In Schools Aims to Create a Pipeline of Future Users

​

​NBC News, EdTech Industry Scrambles to Fight Wave of Bills to Limit Screentime in Schools

​

New York Times, Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore, Even in English Class

​

New York Times, The Screen That Ate Your Child’s Education

​

New York Times, iPads in Kindergarten, YouTube On Breaks: The School Screen-Time Battle

​

New York Times, Chromebook Remorse: Tech Backlash at Schools Extends Beyond Phones 

​

New York Times, You Can’t Game Your Way to a Real Education​​​​​​​​​​​

About iReady

​Not only do students and families alike deeply dislike iReady, educators and experts are calling into question its efficacy, highlighting the complete lack of independent research demonstrating that it improves outcomes at scale:​​

​​

The Digital Delusion, i-Ready: 13 Million Students, Zero Meaningful Evidence 

  • Jared Cooney Horvath, an educator turned neuroscientist, dove into the available research and found:

    • ZERO randomized controlled trials

    • ZERO top-tier (Q1 or Q2) peer-reviewed journal articles

    • TWO lower-tier (Q3) journal articles

      • This article suggests i-Ready diagnostics are less predictive than traditional end-of-year state assessments

      • This article measures improvements only within i-Ready itself — not beyond the tool

    • TWO unlisted journal articles

      • This article finds no difference between users and non-users

      • This article does not include any form of a control group

    • A LARGE VOLUME of gray literature

      • Dissertations, vendor reports, conference posters, and white papers.

​​

The Curriculum Insight Project, We're Ready to Break Up With iReady​

  • “If schools are placing students in iReady’s supplemental/intervention products for core reading instruction, they have a big problem: the students who are below grade level will be ‘tracked’ into working with texts below their grade level. Research shows this to be the opposite of what readers need to grow…Quality curriculum is designed around grade level text work for all students. iReady cannot be considered a good use of ELA instructional time, over this issue alone.”

​​

The Curriculum Insight Project, New study reminds us to stretch struggling readers.iReady (like most Ed Tech) does the opposite.​​​​​

​​

Two viral articles take a deep-dive into the questionable business practices of Curriculum Associates, the makers of iReady.

​

​

Meanwhile, Curriculum Associates are embroiled in a lawsuit over claims that it has misused student data:

​

MSN, Parents, i-Ready is facing a lawsuit — here’s why 

​

"...it“alleges that the core business model of this company is to harvest as much information as is technologically possible on our children and then monetize that data.” She continued, “We are alleging that this monetization involves sharing our kids’ personal information with dozens of other companies for a host of commercial purposes.”"

​

"The lawsuit also claims Curriculum Associates “uses student information to build highly invasive psychological profiles on children that purport to predict future student behavior and performance but are often to the students’ detriment.”"

About AI

ARTICLES

​

Chalkbeat, Why Sal Khan’s AI revolution hasn’t happened yet, according to Sal Khan

  • "Kristen DiCerbo, the organization’s chief learning officer, said AI can only respond to students based on what they ask. And it turns out, she said, “Students aren’t great at asking questions well.” DiCerbo was initially hopeful that AI would be able to personalize instruction to students’ needs and interests. That hasn’t happened. “So far I am not seeing the revolution in education,” she said."

​

​Current Affairs, AI Is Destroying The University and Learning Itself

​

Education Week, Real-Time Data Shows Exactly How Students Use AI on School Technology

  • An analysis of 1.2 million student AI interactions on school-issued devices in more than 1,300 districts found that 1 in 5 interactions involved "cheating, self-harm, bullying and other problematic behaviors".

​

The Guardian, Google faces lawsuit after Gemini chatbot allegedly instructed man to kill himself

  • Google Gemini, the preferred model in K12 schools, allegedly led a 36-year old man with no documented history of mental health issues to suicide. What is striking about this incident is that all the "guardrails" were functioning as designed. The system even assured him guardrails were in place when he grew uncomfortable, and yet Gemini continued to lead him down a dark path. 

​​

MLA, Statement on AI and Assessment

  • “Strongly opposes the use of generative AI technology as a primary means of assessing student writing. At no time should AI be used as the sole means of “grading” student essays”.

​​

RESEARCH & WHITE PAPERS

​

Ben Williamson et al., National Education Policy Center, Time for a Pause: Without Effective Public Oversight, AI in Schools Will Do More Harm Than Good

Mary Burns et al., Brookings Institute, A new direction for students in an AI world: Prosper, prepare, protect

​

Stanford Scale Initiative, Understanding the Evidence Base for AI in K12 Education

​

Perlis RH, Gunning FM, Uslu AA, et al. Generative AI Use and Depressive Symptoms Among US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2026

  • Article: How is AI use connected with depression?

  • ​​”...daily or frequent use of AI is significantly associated with greater levels of depressive symptoms. The odds of reporting moderate depression were 30% higher among people who used AI each day.”

​​

Grace Liu, et al., AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance (pre-print)

  • "In a series of large-scale human experiments, involving arithmetic and reading comprehension, we find that AI assistance improves immediate performance, but it comes at a heavy cognitive cost: after just ∼10 minutes of AI-assisted problem-solving, people who lost access to the AI performed worse and gave up more frequently than those who never used it. These findings raise urgent questions about the cumulative effects of daily AI use on human persistence and reasoning. We caution that if such effects accumulate with sustained AI use, current AI systems — optimized only for short-term helpfulness — risk eroding the very human capabilities they are meant to support."​​​

​

FACEBOOK

Carreon (320 x 70 px) (3).png

CONTACT

SMUSD Parents for Intentional Tech is an independent organization and not affiliated with or endorsed by the San Marcos Unified School District.

bottom of page